[PATCH] Improvements on JDiveLog import

[Salvador Cuñat]

Hi Miika.

The patch works very fine,  but made me notice another case, as I have
recorded in jdivelog some older dives originating from aladin computers
imported from datatrak.   These dives store the sample time in format  
      0.3333333336 min for 0:20 min  (this is 20 secs)
      1.6666666666 min  for 1:40 min  (this is 100 secs)
and so.
The problem is that jdivelog2subsurface  converts to 0:3333333336 min,
1:6666666666 min, etc, what causes strange behaviors in the rest of
calculations of subsurface (SAC, OTUs, etc).

I'm not sure it's worth the effort, but if you want to try, there are
attached a dive from jdivelog,  the xsltproc output, an the dive as
saved by subsurface.

Best regards.

Salva.

El sáb, 24-11-2012 a las 12:12 +0200, Miika Turkia escribió: 
> If dive computer does not record the sample interval, but records time
> stamps on the samples, we use those.
> 
> A couple of corner cases fixed that were noticed in new log samples.
> Also fixes when importing dives logged in imperial units.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miika Turkia <miika.turkia at gmail.com>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: otra_sola_99.jlb
Type: application/xml
Size: 88733 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20121125/018ee920/attachment-0001.wsdl>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: xsltproc_99.xml
Type: application/xml
Size: 9337 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20121125/018ee920/attachment-0002.xml>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: subsurface_99.xml
Type: application/xml
Size: 7145 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20121125/018ee920/attachment-0003.xml>