the latest defaultfile branch

[Mikko Rasa]

On 16.09.2012 16:39, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
> i'm also seeing this passed:
> DIVE_DEPTH, dive->maxdepth
>
> which is of type "depth_t" instead of:
> DIVE_DEPTH, dive->maxdepth.mm
>
> ^ hmm, is this safe? are we certain that "mm" has the same address as
> the struct address on _all_ systems?

The standard says it has.  I can't vouch for _all_ systems, since there 
may be some broken implementations from several decades ago, but I'd be 
surpised if there was some relevant implementation which violates the 
standard in this way.

-- 
Mikko