Plans to move the build system to CMake?

[Tomaz Canabrava]

Ok, Makefile will stay. :)



2013/4/1 Lutz Vieweg <lvml at 5t9.de>

> On 04/01/2013 05:18 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
>
>> CMake has some advantages over Makefiles  ( specially being able to
>> compile with different compilers that doesn`t supports *nix based
>> makefiles, like MSVC compiller )
>>
>
> A compiler does not need to support a certain makefile format, as
> it is the job of "make" to call a compiler, not vice versa.
>
> And at least many years ago, when I was forced to use MSVC for some
> job, it was no problem at all to invoke the compiler executable from
> just any make variant available (I used "nmake" and later GNU make
> for that).
>
>
>  and also has a deep integration with
>> Qt, understanding the moc files generated by the qt-preprocessor
>>
>
> It scares me when I read "deep integration", because a GUI library
> (and even a precompilation helper tool like "moc") and "make" implement
> completely orthogonal things, which should not require any kind of
> integration.
>
> Invoking "moc" from a makefile should not be a problem.
>
> Regards,
>
> Lutz Vieweg
> ______________________________**_________________
> subsurface mailing list
> subsurface at hohndel.org
> http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/**subsurface<http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20130401/d80f087e/attachment-0001.html>