SubSurface Enhancement Proposal

[Dirk Hohndel]

On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 15:16 -0700, Dazed_75 wrote:
> I've waited 9 days in the hopes of seeing further comments.  I must
> say I am truly amazed not to see more interest.  I and as many as
> 2-300 others have had these features in MSDOS and Windows or Linux and
> DOSBOX for 25 years.

So if some of those 2-300 who absolutely love those features and
consider them important will join us here and help develop the features,
great. If they all just sit there (like you) and say "I want this, you
have to implement it" then... I don't know, I don't think this will go
very far.

> I don't like losing them but since I have no interest in forking and
> all that goes with that, I guess they are not going to happen.  I will
> continue to use SubSurface to get the import from many DCs support
> etc. and perhaps I can still find a way to contribute.

Excellent that's great.

> Is there anywhere I can look back and see the reasons you have decided
> to migrate to Qt?

Sure. Google is your friend. You'll find long public conversations about
why we decided to give up on Gtk and switch to Qt. And having found
Tomaz made this a really really good decision.

> Please protect my address like I protect yours. When sending messages
> to multiple recipients, use the BCC: (Blind carbon copy). Remove
> addresses from a forwarded message body before clicking Send. 

BTW: bullshit signatures like this one make me think that you are just
looking for stuff to complain about.

But maybe that's just me.

You are posting with your sacred email address to a public mailing
list...

cheers
 
/D