old tags lost

[Tomaz Canabrava]

I tougth that the new tag system used the old 'tags' internally . I'll try
to take a look at this, but don't promess a thing, since I didn't worked on
the tag system.


On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 01:17 +0200, Miika Turkia wrote:
> > I'll do the bug reports after my last 2 dives. Now it is time for
> > breakfast...
>
> Enjoy.
>
> I had been hoping to cut 4.0 tomorrow. At this point I doubt this will
> happen.
>
> /D
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 1:09 AM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org>
> > wrote:
> >         On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 01:06 +0200, Miika Turkia wrote:
> >         > Seems that current version of Subsurface looses old tags. At
> >         least for
> >         > me only the first tag of a dive is stored and the rest is
> >         discarded.
> >         > (Tags were set back at Gtk times.)
> >
> >
> >         Please create a blocker bug for this one.
> >
> >         I haven't seen the behavior, but I'm sure you can provide a
> >         file saved
> >         by Subsurface 3.1 that demostrates the issue when opened with
> >         the latest
> >         version, right?
> >
> >         Thanks
> >
> >         /D
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> subsurface mailing list
> subsurface at hohndel.org
> http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20131212/e29bbc48/attachment.html>