Debian package

[Linus Torvalds]

I still don't understand why people insisted on the stupid shared library
approach.

It was stupid a year ago, it I'd stupid now. Why do we do it again? It has
only downsides, no upsides. Libdivecomputer isn't used enough for the
"sharing"part of shared libraries to make sense.

We used to link statically. It's the right way to do these things.

       Linus
 On Feb 20, 2013 7:41 AM, "Dirk Hohndel" <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:

> Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <cristian.ionescu-idbohrn at axis.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Jef Driesen wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm not sure what's the best way to handle this. If I would enable
> >> the libtool version mechanism, then basically every release will
> >                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> bump the soname. I don't know if that actually helps or not.
> >   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > I think that's the best compromise for now.  So we'll have:
> >
> >       libdivecomputer1
> >       libdivecomputer2
> >       libdivecomputer3
>
> So we are calling v0.3 libdivecomputer1?
>
> /D
> _______________________________________________
> subsurface mailing list
> subsurface at hohndel.org
> http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20130220/9bfaaa84/attachment.html>