Test dives

[Miika Turkia]

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:
> Miika Turkia <miika.turkia at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:
>>> Miika Turkia <miika.turkia at gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:
>>>>> I added a few test dives exported from other software (Dm3, DiveLog 5.08,
>>>>> JDiveLog 10.2 from Mac - last one doesn't parse because of encoding... Also
>>>>> a composed XML zip file from DiveLog isn't supported, yet)
>>>>> Find them under dives
>>>>
>>>> Now this gets interesting. Is there ANY logic in the units in the
>>>> dives/TestDiveDiveLog5.08.xml? It seems that some of the temperatures
>>>> are in C (Airtemp and Watertemp) and some in F (samples). Otherwise I
>>>> would guess we are talking metric here, but I do not see any specs
>>>> (another log I have seen from DivingLog had all the units in metric,
>>>> as far as I could guess). BTW is the Weight in kg or lb?
>>>
>>> I have purchased DivingLog and should be able to create any combination
>>> of data for the test file that we could possibly want. I'll do a set in
>>> a moment that describe what SHOULD be there in their notes, maybe that
>>> will clear things up.
>>>
>>> That said, I really want to release 3.0.1 in the next couple of hours,
>>> so this may have to wait for 3.0.2 (if we end up needing that) or 3.1.
>>>
>>>> The divelogs.de UDCF format looks like it shouldn't take long to write
>>>> support for. I'll look into it this evening.
>>>
>>> It is evening for you, right? No pressure, just making sure I understand
>>> what may be coming in in patches in the next hour or two
>>
>> I currently have one version of the DivingLog XSLT. So a bit of
>> verification and that could possibly be used as is. However, this
>> could use a bit more testing than a new support to make sure things
>> are not going to be any worse than they currently are.
>>
>> I have not started with the UDCF yet, but that could be reasonably
>> fast to implement. However, no guarantees. (And yes, it is evening for
>> me)
>
> I can hold off 3.0.1 a couple hours longer if that is a realistic thing
> to do. I don't see the UDCF as that important since we have a different
> format from them that we support. So I think the best possible DivingLog
> support would be my preference.
>
> I'll add a few more exported dives from DivingLog next (and fix the
> naming of the existing ones).

In that case, here is the DivingLog XSLT if anyone can give it a test.

miika
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-XSLT-for-DivingLog.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 7558 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20130226/1fc2da26/attachment.obj>