Fwd: sample UDDF file

Jan Schubert Jan.Schubert at GMX.li
Wed Feb 27 03:41:33 PST 2013


On 27.02.2013 12:13, Miika Turkia wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Jan Schubert <Jan.Schubert at gmx.li> wrote:
>> On 24.02.2013 14:16, Miika Turkia wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Jan Schubert <Jan.Schubert at gmx.li> wrote:
>>> Here we go with a sample UDDF file, not supposed to be published in public
>>> as this is not my own data.
>>> Issue is deco not showing up in subsurface (nor JDiveLog) but in the DR5
>>> itself.
>>
>> The log does not seem to contain any DR5 originating deco information. The
>> following is a normal sample:
>>
>>
>> OK, this is still an open issue, lets wait until HW is back to office.
>>
>> But there is an other issue I just forgot to mention and to ask about:
>>
>> The dives imported from the DR5 UDDF data (the old one and the new one as
>> well) gets imported with a wrong date from 1970 while the data contain
>> correct dates!?
>>
>> Miika would you please have a look to this?
> One syntax to grab the date is missing from the XSLT. However, also
> the 2006-04-28T15:49 format for date is not parsed correctly, i.e.
> when grabbing the date string as is the time field remains empty. I'll
> send a patch this evening for this. However, should it be enough to
> just return the above format for data & time or should the XSLT split
> the date and time fields?

I guess this question is supposed to be asked in the mailing list
considering how to process the date further!? From a users point of view
one just wants to see, hm to say, date and time :-).

Thx Miika,
//Jan


More information about the subsurface mailing list