Fwd: sample UDDF file

[Dirk Hohndel]

Jan Schubert <Jan.Schubert at GMX.li> writes:

> On 27.02.2013 12:13, Miika Turkia wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Jan Schubert <Jan.Schubert at gmx.li> wrote:
>>> On 24.02.2013 14:16, Miika Turkia wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Jan Schubert <Jan.Schubert at gmx.li> wrote:
>>>> Here we go with a sample UDDF file, not supposed to be published in public
>>>> as this is not my own data.
>>>> Issue is deco not showing up in subsurface (nor JDiveLog) but in the DR5
>>>> itself.
>>>
>>> The log does not seem to contain any DR5 originating deco information. The
>>> following is a normal sample:
>>>
>>>
>>> OK, this is still an open issue, lets wait until HW is back to office.
>>>
>>> But there is an other issue I just forgot to mention and to ask about:
>>>
>>> The dives imported from the DR5 UDDF data (the old one and the new one as
>>> well) gets imported with a wrong date from 1970 while the data contain
>>> correct dates!?
>>>
>>> Miika would you please have a look to this?
>> One syntax to grab the date is missing from the XSLT. However, also
>> the 2006-04-28T15:49 format for date is not parsed correctly, i.e.
>> when grabbing the date string as is the time field remains empty. I'll
>> send a patch this evening for this. However, should it be enough to
>> just return the above format for data & time or should the XSLT split
>> the date and time fields?
>
> I guess this question is supposed to be asked in the mailing list
> considering how to process the date further!? From a users point of view
> one just wants to see, hm to say, date and time :-).

Ok, you list me :-)

Are we parsing this in the XSLT now? Are we getting it right? Is there a
sample file that I could include in the dives directory so we are all
looking at the same files?

/D