deco calculations

[Robert C. Helling]

On Jan 4, 2013, at 7:06 AM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:

Good morning,

> 
> I took a stab at implementing our own deco calculations.
> 

nice.

> I have some issues with this (as noted in the commit messages). My
> biggest concern is that apparently changing the GFlow and GFhigh values
> has no impact on the deco curve whatsoever. And that is a huge red flag
> to me…

I haven't had time to look at the code but I will as soon as my six month old daughter I am supposed to entertain falls asleep.


> So please, give it a try and find the bugs.



But I ran it with data from my latest dive on which it seems to think I violated the ceiling which results in the ceiling being a self-intersecting surface, see screen-shot attached.

Best
Robert

--                                                                              
.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oO 
Robert C. Helling     Elite Master Course Theoretical and Mathematical Physics  
                      Scientific Coordinator                                   
                      Ludwig Maximilians Universitaet Muenchen, Dept. Physik    
print "Just another   Phone: +49 89 2180-4523  Theresienstr. 39, rm. B339       
    stupid .sig\n";   http://www.atdotde.de 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20130104/4998fc18/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screen Shot 2013-01-04 at 8.10.26 AM.png
Type: image/png
Size: 107478 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20130104/4998fc18/attachment-0001.png>