deco calculations

Dirk Hohndel dirk at hohndel.org
Fri Jan 4 06:42:31 PST 2013


On Jan 3, 2013, at 11:16 PM, Robert C. Helling wrote:
>> I have some issues with this (as noted in the commit messages). My
>> biggest concern is that apparently changing the GFlow and GFhigh values
>> has no impact on the deco curve whatsoever. And that is a huge red flag
>> to me…
> 
> I haven't had time to look at the code but I will as soon as my six month old daughter I am supposed to entertain falls asleep.

Excellent. But as the parents among us know… this could take a while :-)

>> So please, give it a try and find the bugs.
> 
> <Screen Shot 2013-01-04 at 8.10.26 AM.png>
> 
> But I ran it with data from my latest dive on which it seems to think I violated the ceiling which results in the ceiling being a self-intersecting surface, see screen-shot attached.

Normally Subsurface should have added another 0 depth plot_info entry at the end and the code was supposed to force the ceiling area up to 0 as well. That clearly didn't happen…

Bug.

/D
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4130 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20130104/6895dac1/attachment.bin>


More information about the subsurface mailing list