[PATCH 2/2] Do a minimal hook-up of the dive plan tree view to the actual planning
dirk at hohndel.org
Sat Jan 5 23:37:26 PST 2013
Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> writes:
>> I dunno. And I do think the input fields are much too big. I suspect
>> they don't need individual labeling. Just once at the top? That was
>> one of the things I liked about the treeview, even if it then sucked
>> in so many other ways.
> I can look into that as well.
Ok, a very aggressive implementation of that (plus the fix for the
ComboBoxEntry) has been pushed.
Let me know what you think.
More information about the subsurface