Plans [was: Re: Gconf or GSettings? - leading to a wider question]

[Lubomir I. Ivanov]

On 23 January 2013 22:42, Robert C. Helling <helling at atdotde.de> wrote:
>
> On Jan 23, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
>> No, definitely not worth it. I hadn't taken the integer pixels into
>> account.
>
> In that case, and assuming someone else fixes this annoying max_zoom/min_zoom issue:
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Helling <helling at atdotde.de>

i'm a bit busy and tired to dive into that, but assuming there is
accumulation error - there is always error prediction and correction.
assuming there is only real parts consisting of truncation of
precision values at the desired results, i'm sure there are some
correcting solutions to be observed.

this is definitely not the case if we had to stare at root locusts for
weeks solving polynomial and resonance for a certain transfer function
- e.g. the product of a complex plane in the most desired of matters.
:\

lubomir
--