[PATCH] Don't mark divelist changed for automated merges after all

[Dirk Hohndel]

Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org> writes:

>
> This was well-intentioned and conceptually right, it's just not worth it.
>
> Of course, the fact that the test-cases triggered the automatic merging is 
> interesting, 

And intentional...

> but it really _is_ true that we might as well not save for changes
> like this that we do automatically. After all, even though we change
> the dive state, if we exit and reload it, we'll end up with the same
> thing, so the saving doesn't really matter.

I hadn't thought about it that way.

/D