[PATCH] Include more information on Aquadivelog import

Dirk Hohndel dirk at hohndel.org
Sat Jun 8 21:35:46 PDT 2013


On June 8, 2013 9:32:25 PM Miika Turkia <miika.turkia at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Robert C. Helling <helling at atdotde.de>wrote:
>
> >
> > On Jun 9, 2013, at 6:05 AM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> >
> > > <= 2m == 1 star
> > > <= 4m == 2 stars
> > > <= 6m == 3 stars
> > > <= 10m == 4 stars
> > > more == 5 stars
> >
> > Where do you dive? I would say (for fresh water of course)
> >
> > <= 0.3m == 1 star
> > <= 1m == 2 stars
> > <= 3m == 3 stars
> > <= 8m == 4 stars
> > more == 5 stars.
> >
>
> This clearly shows the problem of mapping meters to our visibility rating.
> I would call 10m a poor visibility :D

Me, too.
I was trying to find a middle ground.
In Palau we complained when the viz was below about 15-20m. And in Brazil 
we enjoyed 50-100m on many dives :D

>
> I'll throw in some numbers and if someone does not like them, Dirk might
> accept patches.

Sounds good

/D




More information about the subsurface mailing list