possible O2 PP display bug
Robert C. Helling
robert at euve10195.vserver.de
Sat Mar 2 10:23:10 PST 2013
Am 02.03.2013 um 19:04 schrieb Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org>:
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org> writes:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Now you cannot do that. Because 1.xy would also be 1.xy if x > 0
>>
>> We could recognize old files that haven't been over-saved at all with
>> new versions. They have numbers in the form "x. y" or "x.y0" or
>> "x.yz0", none of which happen in new files. So the old format is
>> recognizable, but:
>>
>> Once it's been loaded and then saved in the new format, there's no
>> going back. That would be true regardless of the details new format
>> (ie also if it was always fixed at three decimal digits (ie w.xyz)..
>
> But that's important because our regular users outside this mailing list
> haven't resaved data yet, right?
>
> SO maybe we SHOULD write such parsing code and up the version number for
> the file format in 3.0.2?
>
Could somebody please provide me with an example file that would need fixing?
More information about the subsurface
mailing list