possible O2 PP display bug

Robert C. Helling robert at euve10195.vserver.de
Sat Mar 2 10:23:10 PST 2013



Am 02.03.2013 um 19:04 schrieb Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org>:

> Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org> writes:
> 
>> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Now you cannot do that. Because 1.xy would also be 1.xy if x > 0
>> 
>> We could recognize old files that haven't been over-saved at all with
>> new versions. They have numbers in the form "x. y" or "x.y0" or
>> "x.yz0", none of which happen in new files. So the old format is
>> recognizable, but:
>> 
>> Once it's been loaded and then saved in the new format, there's no
>> going back. That would be true regardless of the details new format
>> (ie also if it was always fixed at three decimal digits (ie w.xyz)..
> 
> But that's important because our regular users outside this mailing list
> haven't resaved data yet, right?
> 
> SO maybe we SHOULD write such parsing code and up the version number for
> the file format in 3.0.2?
> 

Could somebody please provide me with an example file that would need fixing?


More information about the subsurface mailing list