Thoughts about UI changes in 3.0.2

[Dirk Hohndel]

On Mar 2, 2013, at 4:34 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:

> On 2 March 2013 23:37, Jan Schubert <Jan.Schubert at gmx.li> wrote:
>> - I like that subsurface remembers frame sizes when changed very much, thx
>> - the new dive edit dialog looks nice, but only in default size
>> - i do not like the new dive edit dialog not (up)scaling when resizing
>> the window, I've been able to have a really large Notes entry field
>> before which is now only quite small
>> 
> 
> 
> i had some difficulties with scaling the contents of a
> GtkScrolledWindow based on dialog/parent resize.
> what didn't make absolutely no sense to me is that you can capture a
> dialog resize event, resize the contents of the scrolled widget to fit
> that new dialog size, but then since you have overwritten a (void
> returning handler) function, you cannot invalidate the window contents
> at all so the dialog looks like a glitch (or at least on Windows OS).
> so that sort of resize was something i admit i wasn't able to solve,
> indeed.

Very strange. Worst case we need to disable the scrollable container for 3.0.2

/D
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4130 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20130302/2bd2ecb1/attachment-0001.bin>