[PATCH] Hook up colour printing with print dialog.

Amit Chaudhuri amit.k.chaudhuri at gmail.com
Wed Mar 13 00:22:28 PDT 2013


Hi,

I've just sent two patches by separate mail.  Together they repeat what was
sent the other day and then amend to change grid colour, default for
printing and spelling.

Question: is this the accepted way to package an amendment to a patch, or
is it usual to force git to roll the multiple steps into a single patch? If
so, how can that be done?

A

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:19 AM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:

> Miika Turkia <miika.turkia at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:
> >> Amit Chaudhuri <amit.k.chaudhuri at gmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >>> Hi Lubomir,
> >>>
> >>> colour - sure....will do this evening.
> >>>
> >>> I'll wait on other opinions on the default (in case anyone violently
> >>> disagrees).
> >>
> >> I think color printing should be the default. Most printers are indeed
> >> color printers these days (at least for "Joe consumer"). And if I look
> >> at other software (browsers and email programs come to mind) they all
> >> create color printouts by default.
> >
> > Is the user's choice remembered over sessions? I think it should
> > default to whatever user printed the last time (after the initial
> > default value dictated by Dirk ;) of course)
>
> Is that what other software does? I don't think so...
>
> But I'm open to be over-ruled on that part of it. I just hate adding
> more and more and more things to our configuration space.
>
> /D
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20130313/73efdacc/attachment.html>


More information about the subsurface mailing list