Ubuntu still shows 1.2

[Amit Chaudhuri]

Ok - if it's pretty much covered then plenty of other things to do...

[Currently looking at a simplified model/view for dive info in Qt4 & Qt5 to
see how easy/hard that bit might be.]

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:

> Amit Chaudhuri <amit.k.chaudhuri at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > just a thought.  It sounds to me as though we have at least 3 people who
> > are close to having packaging working (or really do have it working) on
> > Ubuntu & Debian; possibly more people and probably more distros.  There
> may
> > be an issue of availability of boxes with 32/64 bit.  Would it make sense
> > to catalogue who has what arch and get everyone base-lined on the
> > git/packaging stuff necessary for anyone to package this stuff up? Maybe
> > start with the top X Linux distros we want to target and later extend to
> > other platforms? Perhaps between us we can get both Dirk and Robert a
> > little more sleep ;) [Actually, Robert sounds as though he may have
> issues
> > beyond our control....but you'll get the idea].
> >
> > I have 64-bit m/c currently running openSUSE 12.2 and Oracle VirtualBox
> so
> > could add OS's to that.
>
> I think for most Linux flavors the best solution is to use THEIR build
> service.
>
> We are already on koji (Fedora), openSUSE Build Service (openSUSE),
> ArchLinux, Gentoo and a feww others (I need to go through my email to
> make sure I have them all listed). We are about to be in Ubuntu 13.04,
> because of the Debian freeze we aren't quite there yet for Debian.
>
> At least for Ubuntu by being on THEIR build service I think we could
> get people on 12.04 and later easy access to the packages. Not quite
> sure about the best approach to do this for Debian users.
>
> /D
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20130320/441c1ef7/attachment-0001.html>