Thought about a Qt port

Alberto Mardegan mardy at users.sourceforge.net
Sat Mar 30 10:50:03 PDT 2013


On 03/30/2013 07:40 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> Thiago Macieira <thiago at macieira.org> writes:
>> In fact, maybe the ideal solution is hybrid: leave the current Makefile for 
>> detecting and installing, but ask qmake to generate another Makefile for 
>> building. Or if we can get the install rules working with qmake, create a 
>> simple configure script.
> 
> This /sounds/ quite convoluted to me. Didn't you say earlier that it's
> reasonably easy to simply have a plain Makefile that pulls all the
> pieces together?

I also considered the same possibility that Thiago proposed; it wouldn't
be complicated, but OTOH it looks like we can have everything Qt needs
just by adding a couple of rules on the current Makefile.

I'm working on it, I'll push the thing somewhere as soon as I get
something working.

Ciao,
  Alberto

-- 
http://blog.mardy.it <- geek in un lingua international!


More information about the subsurface mailing list