Thought about a Qt port

[Dirk Hohndel]

On March 31, 2013 11:43:54 AM "Lubomir I. Ivanov" <neolit123 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 31 March 2013 20:37, Alberto Mardegan <mardy at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> > Let me know if the usage of Qt Designer files is OK or if you prefer to
> > see all the Qt code in .cpp files (I suspect the latter, since you were
> > not using Glade). I actually never used Qt Designer myself before (my
> > QtWidget needs were always minimal), but I'm starting to like it. :-)
> >
> >
>
> QtDesigner is nicer than Glade and .ui files get a +1 from me.

I played with Glade and didn't find it helpful. My limited experience 
with the QtCreator (I think) was much more favorable, but that was in 
the context of QML.

So to answer the question: I'm fine using a UI design tool, especially 
if that makes it easier for more people to contribute UI components.

/D