Problems with dive planning module.

[Robert Helling]

On 17.10.2013, at 16:39, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:

> If there is ONE feature that I regret having added, it's dive planning.
> This has sucked an incredible amount of my time (for the Gtk version)
> and now Tomaz' time with zero benefit to the vast majority of people.
> 
> I am still tempted to keep the interactive input and simply drop the
> planner as it seems absolutely not worth the pain it is causing. Not to
> mention the risk if some bozo decides to dive this plan, gets bent for
> whatever reason and then decides that this couldn't possibly have been
> their fault.

No no no! Maybe that's my observational bias but for me and my friends the planner (besides the beautiful profile) is the unique selling point for subsurface! Divelogs there are many. But there is no planner at all with a decent user interface. And to my mind, we are quite close here. Yes, there are things to do, but I would rate them worth every byte of code.

Just my $.02

Robert

-- 
.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oO
Robert C. Helling     Elite Master Course Theoretical and Mathematical Physics
                      Scientific Coordinator
                      Ludwig Maximilians Universitaet Muenchen, Dept. Physik
                      Phone: +49 89 2180-4523  Theresienstr. 39, rm. B339
                      http://www.atdotde.de

Enhance your privacy, use cryptography! My PGP keys have fingerprints
A9D1 A01D 13A5 31FA 6515  BB44 0820 367C 36BC 0C1D    and
DCED 37B6 251C 7861 270D  5613 95C7 9D32 9A8D 9B8F




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20131017/75c44bc2/attachment.sig>