dive merge
Dirk Hohndel
dirk at hohndel.org
Tue Sep 24 03:30:13 UTC 2013
On Tue, 2013-09-24 at 13:09 +0300, Lubomir I. Ivanov wrote:
> >
> > That seems to work reliably for me and feels much more robust and
> > straight forward ;-)
> >
>
> yes, this is much better.
Thinking more about this implementation and the implementation we had
for the Gtk version I now (after sleeping for a few hours and then being
wide awake at 3am) realize why the Gtk version was done the way it was
done. We want to ensure that this is only called with two (or, I guess,
theoretically, more) consecutive dives selected. Everything else are
entirely non-realistic scenarios.
So I'll add that check as well.
/D
More information about the subsurface
mailing list