[PATCH] Mark Air/Water temp field red for wrong input.

Yosef Hamza jo.adam.93 at gmail.com
Sun Apr 13 09:19:15 PDT 2014


Done.


On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Miika Turkia <miika.turkia at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Yosef Hamza <jo.adam.93 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> First I do know Regular expression.
>>
>> Second What I wanted to make is "ONE" character margin of error -If you
>> changed the text further with that error it will give red-.
>> That wasn't my first solution to that problem, I was careful about
>> keeping the functionality while adding that 1 character margin of error
>> -but if edited further with that error it will mark it red-.
>>
>
> Ah, in that case this code makes sense. Should probably include the
> reasoning in the commit message as it was not clear from the code (at least
> I missed it completely).
>
>
>> The regex solution came to mind but wasn't exactly what I wanted.
>>
>> The Question is what I wanted was the right approach for that problem
>> -adding one character error margin-? and if so is it worth it?
>>
>
> This is (IMHO) better than the regex I first had in mind. In big picture
> they both work well as the actual parsing of the input value discards the
> possible errors allowed by my regexp.
>
> Currently you have still a slight inconsistency. If one starts typing with
> plus or minus sign, then an error is indicated. This is cleared when adding
> a digit.
>
> I would also rather have one validation function instead of having the
> same code twice. Just call the validation function from both of these
> locations.
>
> I also spotted two spelling errors:
> invaild => invalid
> percision => precision
>
> miika
>
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Miika Turkia <miika.turkia at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Yosef Hamza <jo.adam.93 at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the review.
>>>
>>> I made it a little more tolerant if editing existing values instead of
>>> giving red while deleting it at some point -after deleting the Unit and
>>> after last number after the '.'-  then back to normal yellow and for empty
>>> string -or should I leave it marked red for empty string?- which made it
>>> more consistent for the user.
>>>
>>
>> It can be made more tolerant also by modifying the regular expression.
>> Which I think should be done instead of adding more if statements. I agree
>> that empty value should not be marked as red. The following regular
>> expression should be the same as your if statements (or at least very close
>> to it).
>>
>>     if
>> (!text.contains(QRegExp("^[-+]{0,1}[0-9]*([,.][0-9]*){0,1}([°]{0,1}[CF]{0,1}){0,1}$")))
>> {
>>         QPalette p;
>>         p.setBrush(QPalette::Base, QColor(Qt::red).lighter());
>>         ui.airtemp->setPalette(p);
>>     }
>>
>> The regular expression above will keep everything yellow, if it is
>> possible that completed syntax will be yellow (as your added if statements
>> would do).
>>
>> If you need to modify the regular expression, here is a quick run-down:
>> [asdf]      Any one of the characters mentioned inside brackets
>> [-+]{0,1}   This will allow 0 or 1 characters in the previous grouping,
>> in this case inside the angler brackets
>> [0-9]*       Allows any number in the previous grouping
>> [0-9]+      Would allow any number containing at least one digit in the
>> previous grouping
>> (°C){0,1}   Allows text "°C" 0 or 1 times, you can use parentheses for
>> grouping
>>
>> Also your coding style is inconsistent and is not following our coding
>> style:
>>
>> +       }
>> +               else{
>> +                       missing_unit =false;
>>
>> Else should be on same line with closing }
>> There should be space between if or else statement and {
>> Space between = and the following text missing
>>
>> Take a look at file "CodingStyle" in main directory of our source code.
>>
>> miika
>>
>
>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20140413/cb56ddd2/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Mark-Air-Water-temp-field-red-for-wrong-input.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2789 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20140413/cb56ddd2/attachment.obj>


More information about the subsurface mailing list