[PATCH] Various updates to user manual
Willem Ferguson
willemferguson at zoology.up.ac.za
Mon Aug 4 02:02:14 PDT 2014
On 04/08/2014 10:47, Miika Turkia wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Willem Ferguson
> <willemferguson at zoology.up.ac.za
> <mailto:willemferguson at zoology.up.ac.za>> wrote:
>
> On 04/08/2014 07:00, Miika Turkia wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Willem Ferguson
>> <willemferguson at zoology.up.ac.za
>> <mailto:willemferguson at zoology.up.ac.za>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> N.B.:
>> The only outstanding issue that I am aware of, is the
>> discussion last week about including
>> depth and time pointers along the Y and X axes respectively
>> when the cursor is
>> moved about on the profile panel during manual profile
>> creation. This was true for V3 but has since
>> disappeared. I favour the inclusion of the pointers along the
>> depth and time axes.
>> Tomaz indicated that this could easily be done. Pending a
>> final decision on this issue
>> I might do a final modification or two to the text of the manual.
>>
>>
>> What is the solution to this going to be? I created a bug 674
>> during the weekend to remind, that the user manual is currently
>> not ready for release. It has to be updated regarding this
>> feature, whether the X/Y pointers are enabled or not.
>>
>> miika
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> subsurface mailing list
>> subsurface at hohndel.org <mailto:subsurface at hohndel.org>
>> http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
> The manual can only be updated if pointers on the X and Y-axes are
> indeed implemented. Taking into account the intense activity over
> the last 10 days, the problems with the Win support and the fact
> that Tomaz is obviously overloaded, I suggest that the issue about
> pointers on the dive profile stays over for V4.3. Its is a
> nice-to-have, not a blocker (and it should possibly go hand in
> hand with adjusting the way zooming is performed on the dive
> profile, as has been discussed a number of times). It just looks
> to me there are more important issues at the moment to get V4.2
> out. I hope this sounds sensible? :-)
>
>
> I am happy either way, as long as the documentation matches the actual
> functionality, or at least does not describe something that does not
> exist. That is why I consider the current state a blocker... Updating
> the documentation not to mention the markers at all would be quite
> safe in any case. It is not confusing to not describe that feature
> even if it exists, but it sure is confusing if it is documented but
> missing.
>
> miika
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> subsurface mailing list
> subsurface at hohndel.org
> http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
Point taken. I have forgotten that the text about pointers has actually
not been removed and I have clearly not understood your point. Thank
you, Miika.
Kind regards,
willem
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20140804/f5474a84/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the subsurface
mailing list