VPM planning [was: Re: Planner: Multiple Deco calculations ?]

Henrik Brautaset Aronsen subsurface at henrik.synth.no
Thu Aug 28 08:13:45 PDT 2014


On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Guillaume Gardet <guillaume.gardet at free.fr>
wrote:

>
> I'd be more interested in a VPM implementation (that is reasonably well
>> documented). We had a GSOC proposal to do just that and decided not to
>> accept it but it's still something that we are open to if there's a
>> developer with the necessary math / physics background willing to tackle
>> the problem.
>>
>
> Do you have pointers for implementing VPM? Willem wrote it was totally
> proprietary.
>


RGBM is totally proprietary, but VPM is not.  There are several VPM
implementations available, and there has been several long discussions
(technical and not) on this list.

See:

- VPM Technical Discussion:
http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/2014-March/010634.html
- VPM Overview:
http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/2014-March/010746.html
- VPM Discussion & GSoC planning:
http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/2014-March/010819.html
- Technical Discussion on VPM:
http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/2014-March/010544.html
- VPM Support:
http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/2013-March/005070.html

I've added these mailing list links to a new VPM issue @
http://trac.hohndel.org/ticket/721

Cheers,
Henrik
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20140828/75bd222b/attachment.html>


More information about the subsurface mailing list