[PATCH 6/7] Lots of minor UDDF export tweaks.

Miika Turkia miika.turkia at gmail.com
Sun Dec 14 01:12:57 PST 2014


I go the weights to show for me by using node() along with the node-set. I
am a bit puzzled by this as I haven't seen similar syntax anywhere on the
web, but if that is the way to do it and it works for others as well... Can
you also test the patch that I just sent?

For the export, it is good to follow the specifications as closely as
possible (and here I refer to both written specs and the xml schema).
However, for the import we need to be quite lax as I think every single
application produces different UDDF output - at least that is my take from
the sample files I have received.

miika

On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Long, Martin <martin at longhome.co.uk> wrote:

> I'll look into this. The weight at the end was removed intentionally.
> I admit I'm not entirely sure what happened here. I think it was when
> I added the correct namespace this stopped working, and removing
> weight made it work for me. I'll investigate this further tonight.
>
> Btw, weights are now in the informationafterdive. This is an area of
> contradiction between the spec and the schema. I think 'after' makes
> slightly more sense, as you may add/remove weights at the start of the
> dive. Anyway, I need to clarify that.
>
> On 13 December 2014 at 19:59, Miika Turkia <miika.turkia at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Martin Long <martin at longhome.co.uk>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> -          <leadquantity>
> >> -            <xsl:value-of
> >> select="sum(xt:node-set($trimmedweightlist)/weight)"/>
> >> -          </leadquantity>
> >
> > ...
> >>
> >> +          <leadquantity>
> >> +            <xsl:value-of
> select="sum(xt:node-set($trimmedweightlist))"/>
> >> +          </leadquantity>
> >
> >
> > I am testing the UDDF export and don't see any weights exported. Was the
> > "/weight" removed here intentionally when moving the code around? Adding
> > that to the XSLT does not solve the problem. So do you have any idea of
> what
> > is wrong here?
> >
> > miika
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20141214/03318f8c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the subsurface mailing list