OpenSUSE packages

[Dirk Hohndel]

On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 04:17:12PM +0100, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
> 
> Le 30/12/2014 16:05, Dirk Hohndel a écrit :
> >On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 03:20:54PM +0100, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
> >>Le 22/12/2014 21:09, Dirk Hohndel a écrit :
> >>>On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 06:40:51AM -0800, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
> >>>>On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 10:19:11AM +0100, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
> >>>>>Le 20/12/2014 06:40, Dirk Hohndel a écrit :
> >>>>>>We now have official OpenSUSE packages - available at
> >>>>>>http://software.opensuse.org/download.html?project=home:Subsurface-Divelog&package=subsurface.
> >>>>>>I updated the Downloads page accordingly.
> >>>>>Could you enable build for openSUSE 13.1 too, please?
> >>>>I'd love to, if I could figure out how to get it to pull the Qt5 packages
> >>>>from the KDE:QT53 project. There's a bit of spec file magic that I clearly
> >>>>haven't quite figured out, yet.
> >>>OK, with the help of some nice people on the opensuse-buildservice IRC
> >>>channel I think I have figured this out. openSUSE 13.1 is now available as
> >>>well - I tested this in a freshly installed VM and all looks good...
> >>So far, it runs fine on my 13.1. Thanks. :)
> >Yes. The Tumbleweed builds have been broken for a few days and the error
> >message makes no sense to me. It looks like the rpm is packaged and
> >everything and then it fails with a non-sensical error.
> 
> I will try to have look at it. I think I already encountered this error once.
> 
> You should rename your daily build package "subsurface-daily" or
> "subsurface-unstable", otherwise, people will install latest subsurface
> from your repo and then they got your daily instead of your stable
> subsurface.

I was wondering about this... that means I need a different spec file that
renames the executable and the package... but then there is the
ssrfmarblewidget.so that also would have to have two different names. This
gets crazy pretty fast.

I'm not sure what a good way around this mess would be.

/D