SubsurfaceAbout class cleanup.

[Dirk Hohndel]

It was my understanding that we wanted to have the instance classes to
avoid having multiple class objects by mistake and to avoid creating and
destroying these objects at the wrong moment.

So I'm confused why we would now remove them?

/D

On Sat, 2014-02-08 at 09:03 -0200, Tomaz Canabrava wrote:
> I don't mind removing the instance() classes, I created them that way
> so it was easyer to create them in the correct order ( meaning, no
> order at all :P )
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Boris Barbulovski
> <bbarbulovski at gmail.com> wrote:
>         
>         
>         An SubsurfaceAbout class cleanup.
>         
>         
>         Main change is that now SubsurfaceAbout doesn't have instance
>         object, but it constructs and destructs dynamically.
>         
>         
>         If small patch it's acceptable, and continue with this pattern
>         by remove other instance() members(around 10).
>         
>         
>         br, Boris..
>         
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         subsurface mailing list
>         subsurface at hohndel.org
>         http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
>         
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> subsurface mailing list
> subsurface at hohndel.org
> http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface