Deco Terminology - call for discussion
nevesdiver at gmail.com
Wed Feb 12 10:29:09 UTC 2014
While on the process of helping Willem (and all the others) with the
Subsurface manual, I keep wondering if we should change the terminology
that refers to "no-deco" dives (and NDL, etc.).
I Personally hate the fact that people (and books) refer to some dives
as “no decompressions dives” when in reality they should be called
“minimum decompression dives”.
Technically speaking, decompression is a reduction in ambient pression,
which occurs at the end of every single dive.
To me, the difference between dives is that some dictate that only a
“minimum deco” (ascent rate in the region of 3 to 10 m/min and a “safety
stop”) and others dictate one or more “decompression stops”.
Reffering to minimum deco dives as no-deco dives helps, in my oppinion,
to perpetuate the notion that decompression is a somewhat "obscure" and
"esoteric" thing that matters only to experienced or "technical" divers
and that it's relevant only on some of out dives.
I know this is a controversial issue and I certainly don't want to
impose my views on anyone, but I'd like to have your opinions on whether
to apply this view on our manual, or just keep this to myself...
Thanks in advance:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the subsurface