Fix imperial cylinder sizes in equipment tab
Dirk Hohndel
dirk at hohndel.org
Fri Jan 3 09:04:47 UTC 2014
On Fri, 2014-01-03 at 08:54 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Turning C++11 on for Subsurface would destroy support for OS X less than 10.6
> > since only GCC 4.2 can compile for it.
That seems to be wrong - I compiled the latest binaries with clang and
they at least claim to run on 10.5. And frankly, we haven't received any
requests for 10.5 - only 10.6 and newer (I just set it to 10.5 because I
wondered if that would work as well).
Of course I haven't seen anyone actually try it.
> I don't know if people try to use mingw (stable), but iirc that's also
> limited to some old version of gcc. So I don't think C++11 is an
> option for a few more years.
I compile the Windows binaries with
$ i686-w64-mingw32-g++ --version
i686-w64-mingw32-g++ (GCC) 4.8.2 20131016 (Fedora MinGW 4.8.2-1.fc20)
So that shouldn't stop us, either.
If it makes our code better, I'm all for it.
/D
More information about the subsurface
mailing list