Wrong profiles importing from Diving log 5.0 to Subsurface 4.1

Tomaz Canabrava tcanabrava at kde.org
Tue Jul 22 08:37:52 PDT 2014


I would have not ever going to get this =s


On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Miika Turkia <miika.turkia at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Davide DB <dbdavide at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> In my endless tries to import SmartTrak logs I found a bug but I don't
>> know if it's a problem of DL or Subsurface 4.1.
>>
>> Imported a .slg file containing 379 dives to diving log 5.0.
>> Exported fromm DL in xml format (as Subsurface manual suggest)
>> Exported from DL in uddf format as well.
>>
>> xml import: dives seems ok except for some of them with incorrect
>> profiles.
>> uddf import: everything ok.
>>
>> The DL exported xml file contains correct depth points but somehow the
>> profile is completely different (see screenshot). Dive stats indicate
>> correct values
>
>
> It seems that Diving Log has recorded the maximum depth to be a bit less
> than the maximum sample depth. And the Imperial vs. metric unit test was a
> simple comparison, if maximum sample depth is greater than the value of
> maximum depth, then it was considered to be imperial units. Attached patch
> doubles the maximum depth value of this comparison, so the difference must
> be quite significant for this test to fail in the future.
>
> miika
>
> _______________________________________________
> subsurface mailing list
> subsurface at hohndel.org
> http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
>


More information about the subsurface mailing list