Disclaimer for printed dive plan

[Dirk Hohndel]

On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 11:34:09PM +0200, Robert C. Helling wrote:
> 
> > Good. But why add that string a second time? Shouldn't we just have a
> > function in planner.c return the translated string and call that function?
> 
> here is an updated version. As this is C (without ++) I opted for a
> global const char * rather than a global accessor method. Is this too
> lazy?

Nah, that's fine.

Thanks

/D