What's missing for 4.2?
dirk at hohndel.org
Mon Jun 9 13:21:46 PDT 2014
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 09:53:05PM +0200, Robert C. Helling wrote:
> On 09 Jun 2014, at 16:23, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:
> > I seem to remember that there were a couple of small issues with the
> > planner still (but may Robert has already fixed them all).
> indeed there are some loose ends:
> *) More parameters have to be user configurable. For this more screen estate has to be reserved, for example by overlaying the globe that has no function in planner mode anyway. At least we need to be able to configure the ascent speed (these are probably several values for different depths/part of the ascend), we need two ppO2 values for during the dive and for deco, maybe a few other things. These things also have to find their way to the saved configuration. I am happy to take care of this point.
> *) That said, the screen layout of the planner has be be fine tuned to say the least. Some thought has to go into what should be where and close to what. Possibly I am not the ideal person to do this. If there is anybody who feels like a little bit gifted in UI design this would be your job, just wait a few days until I added all the fields that I would like to see (somewhere).
> *) There is also some fine tuning with the scrolling/expansion/contraction of the scene. Currently it is a bit challenging to reach specific values.
> *) The general responsiveness of the graphical editor for deep long dives could as well use some tuning. Some though might be well spend in this bit as well.
> *) I also wanted to add pSCR support (which boils down to a depth dependent effective gas composition given the gas in the cylinder. This is relevant for deco and for plots. This point is a bit ad lib.
> This is what I think the planner would need before being presentable to the general public.
would you mind adding theose as "blocking" bugs to trac?
Any idea how long it will take to implement these?
More information about the subsurface