What's missing for 4.2?

[Robert Helling]

On 09.06.2014, at 22:21, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:

Hi,

> would you mind adding theose as "blocking" bugs to trac?
> 

done, plus a few more.

I was quite surprised that the planner looks somewhat reasonable already when turning on imperial units. Only the MOD’s have far too many significant digits in fee. What about partial pressures (in the graphs) do imperial divers use PSI there?

> Any idea how long it will take to implement these?

The blocking ones I would expect to take me more or less a working day. I hope to be able to allocate that amount of subsurface time over the next two or maximally three weeks, so your schedule looks realistic to me.

Best
Robert

-- 
.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oOo.oO
Robert C. Helling     Elite Master Course Theoretical and Mathematical Physics
                      Scientific Coordinator
                      Ludwig Maximilians Universitaet Muenchen, Dept. Physik
                      Phone: +49 89 2180-4523  Theresienstr. 39, rm. B339
                      http://www.atdotde.de

Enhance your privacy, use cryptography! My PGP keys have fingerprints
A9D1 A01D 13A5 31FA 6515  BB44 0820 367C 36BC 0C1D    and
DCED 37B6 251C 7861 270D  5613 95C7 9D32 9A8D 9B8F




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20140610/8fc3ccc0/attachment.sig>