What's missing for 4.2?

[Dirk Hohndel]

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:01:39AM +0200, Robert Helling wrote:
> 
> > would you mind adding theose as "blocking" bugs to trac?
> 
> done, plus a few more.

Thanks. I noticed at least one that might be better as an email - the
request to do more testing. Most testers don't see the bug and that's not
really a bug or enhancement request - it's a request to the testers :-)

> I was quite surprised that the planner looks somewhat reasonable already
> when turning on imperial units. Only the MOD’s have far too many
> significant digits in fee.

As long as you use our helper functions to get units, imperial vs metric
happens completely automatically behind the scenes. 

> What about partial pressures (in the graphs)
> do imperial divers use PSI there?

Nope - all in atm (or bar)

> > Any idea how long it will take to implement these?
> 
> The blocking ones I would expect to take me more or less a working day.
> I hope to be able to allocate that amount of subsurface time over the
> next two or maximally three weeks, so your schedule looks realistic to
> me.

Excellent.

/D