SS Planner vs PastoDeco

[Dirk Hohndel]

On Jun 10, 2014, at 2:41 PM, roberto forini <forini.r at gmail.com> wrote:

> hi guys! I'm sending a pdf showing a comparison between SS planner and PastoDeco (no GF in vplanner!). It is for a 100 m dive with trimix 12/48 as backgas and 2 deco gas ean40 and ean80 (just to keep a low CNS).
> 
> 1) double step at each deco stop: (snippet of the runtime)
> Subsurface
> 42m 24min 1min
> 42m 25min 1min ?
> 39m 25min 1min 
> 39m 26min 1min ?
> 36m 27min 1min
> 36m 29min 2min ?
> 
> PastoDeco
> 45m TX 12/48 OC 1' 23'
> 42m TX 12/48 OC 1' 24'
> 39m TX 12/48 OC 1' 25'
> 36m TX 12/48 OC 2' 27’

These two are relatively close. I thought we had the double entries fixed. Which version were you testing with?

> 2) CNS is not shown in note but in the dive list it shows 14% that i think is a little bit low :D.

Yes, definitely. I guess I need to go back and stare at the math again and make sure nothing got broken there :-(

> 3) i would not take care about consumptions right now even if pretty different. I think it is because pastodeco has more than 2 parameters for consumptions. Descent, Deep, Ascent and deco.

That’s something Robert wants to add. Can you tell us which parameters it has and which values you set there?

> p.s. is it possible to have in the second column the deco time and in the third column the runtime??

One of those many preferences. The more options, the more complicated things get.

> i've found a bug i will post on bug trace!

Thanks

/D

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20140610/d5dea3cc/attachment.html>