[PATCH] Make ISO-6709 coordinate regex less restrictive

José Carlos Andreu Galán joscandreu at gmail.com
Mon May 26 00:20:48 PDT 2014


Certainly I'm not an expert at regex. I understand what you say.
I'll resubmit the patch with the changes. Thanks for the advice!


2014-05-26 0:41 GMT+02:00 Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org>:

> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 12:02:33AM +0200, José Carlos Andreu Galán wrote:
> > I found myself trying to copy/paste coordinates for my dives from diving
> > websites / forums and Subsurface did not accept them because it was
> > applying strictly the suggestions from ISO6709 Annex D.
> > Now it parses them correctly with messy whitespace and use of '' (double
> > simple quotes) instead of " (single char of double quotes) for the
> seconds
> > symbol which I found to be a very common mistake at this kind of sites.
>
> Thanks for that patch!
> I have a quick question - I think you may have made the reg exp more
> complicated than it needs to be...
>
> > diff --git a/qthelper.cpp b/qthelper.cpp
> > index bcf78b5..0dbe0fc 100644
> > --- a/qthelper.cpp
> > +++ b/qthelper.cpp
> > @@ -82,10 +82,11 @@ bool parseGpsText(const QString &gps_text, double
> *latitude, double *longitude)
> >       // ISO 6709 Annex D representation
> >       //
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_6709#Representation_at_the_human_interface_.28Annex_D.29
> >       // e.g. 52°49'02.388"N 1°36'17.388"E
> > -     if (gps_text.at(0).isDigit() && (gps_text.count(",") % 2) == 0) {
> > +     if (gps_text.at(0).isDigit() && ((gps_text.count(",") % 2) == 0
> || gps_text.count(QChar('\'')) == 6)) {
> >               gpsStyle = ISO6709D;
> > -             regExp = QString("(\\d+)[" UTF8_DEGREE
> "\\s](\\d+)[\'\\s](\\d+)([,\\.](\\d+))?[\"\\s]([NS%1%2])"
> > -                              "\\s*(\\d+)[" UTF8_DEGREE
> "\\s](\\d+)[\'\\s](\\d+)([,\\.](\\d+))?[\"\\s]([EW%3%4])")
> > +             regExp = QString("(\\d+)([" UTF8_DEGREE "\\s]|"
> UTF8_DEGREE "\\s*)(\\d+)([\'\\s]|\'\\s*)(\\d+)([,\\.]
>
>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>                                          that seems silly - why not just "
>                                   (\\d+)[" UTF*_DEGREE "\\s]\\s*(\\d+
>
> If I'm right I think you could simplify the whole patch (as you no longer
> need those extra groups for the '|'...)
>
> Can you comment and maybe resubmit?
>
> /D
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.hohndel.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20140526/40f76325/attachment.html>


More information about the subsurface mailing list