Fix maxdepth calculation on replan

[Robert Helling]

On 03 Nov 2014, at 23:19, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:

Dirk,

> I don't like this patch as it removes a feature. We have seen a few dive
> computers that store a maximum dive depth in the dive header, but when you
> go through the samples, none of the samples are that deep.

fair enough. Then it’s probably better done like this.



Best
Robert

PS: I don’t know why apple mail attaches patches as octet-stream.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20141103/187462c4/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Start-with-0-when-computing-maxdepth-when-fixing-up.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1033 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20141103/187462c4/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20141103/187462c4/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20141103/187462c4/attachment.sig>