[PATCH] Re: [PULL REQUEST] VPM-B

[Robert C. Helling]

> On 17 Aug 2015, at 18:41, Jan Darowski <jan.darowski at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> In my opinion we shouldn't leave this as a preference, it's to
> technical and complicated to explain to most of users. We have the
> conservatism levels already, so users can manipulate how aggressive
> their schedule is.

It’s just that I have a problem with doing things that are obviously stupid. At least first make sure that doing this resolves the differences in schedules with the original fortran program.

Best
Robert
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20150817/e52758b0/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20150817/e52758b0/attachment.sig>