[PATCH 3/3] VPM-B: Add more planner tests

[Rick Walsh]

On 26 Aug 2015 12:47 am, "Miika Turkia" <miika.turkia at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 26 August 2015 at 00:33, Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Add more VPM-B planner tests.  The "expected" total run time is taken
as
> >> the
> >> total run time produced by the Fortran VPM-B program.  For all these
> >> tests, the
> >> results are within two minutes, which is a good result, but most are
> >> classified
> >> as a "fail".
> >>
> >
> > It would be helpful if we could consider a result close to our
benchmark as
> > a pass, and show the difference.  But I don't know how to do that.  For
> > example, we could consider +/- (1% + 1 minute) a pass.
>
> Would this help?
> http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtest.html#QVERIFY
>

Yes, I think it would. But not tonight.

Thanks,

Rick
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20150826/f8e8ecb2/attachment-0001.html>