Re. subsurface: FTBFS in experimental

[Tomaz Canabrava]

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Robert C. Helling <helling at atdotde.de>
wrote:

> Lutz,
>
> On 26 Aug 2015, at 20:10, Lutz Vieweg <lvml at 5t9.de> wrote:
>
> I don't know anything about copr yet, and I am kind of sure that the
> way I built Subsurface for CentOS (in a freely relocateable directory
> which holds everything including a script which deduces the required
> environment-variable settings from its own path, setting up a symbolic
> link under /tmp/ to work as an "anchor" for the --prefix=... setting)
> will probably violate tons of RHEL distribution policies ;-)
>
>
> I don’t know anything about CentOS, but these days I happen to build
> subsurface on Macs which only have homebrew which should be much more basic
> than any Linux distribution package manager. But here, I just have to
> install a few libraries (namely, quoting from the INSTALL file  asciidoc
> libzip sqlite cmake libusb pkg-config automake libtool), then, and I admit
> that is a bit painful, install Qt5 from sources and all the rest
>

You don't need to install qt5 from sources anymore ( for quite a while
actually, I'v fixed that around six months ago )



> is (or at least should be) handled by the subsurface build script (in
> scripts/build.sh). I don’t have to set any environment variable, fix paths
> or such. I am surprised the experience is so much different for you.
>
> Best
> Robert
>
> _______________________________________________
> subsurface mailing list
> subsurface at subsurface-divelog.org
> http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20150826/d3ff1bd7/attachment.html>