[PATCH] More tolerant about spaces in GPS coordinates.
Patrick Valsecchi
patrick at thus.ch
Sun Feb 22 10:24:15 PST 2015
On 22. 02. 15 17:52, Miika Turkia wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Patrick Valsecchi <patrick at thus.ch
> <mailto:patrick at thus.ch>> wrote:
>
> On 02/03/2015 04:41 PM, Dirk Hohndel wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:32:40PM +0100, Patrick Valsecchi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is a tentative to make subsurface a bit more flexible
> when parsing GPS
> coordinates. I like to geo-reference my dives, but copy
> and pasting the
> coordinates from web sites was quite a pain (needed a lot
> of manual
> correction).
>
> Please have a look and comment. I'm quite tempted to go
> wild and do another
> rewrite without using regular expressions... would be more
> flexible and less
> code, IMHO.
>
> Absolutely. By all means, please rewrite it without regular
> expression if
> that makes it more flexible.
>
> Given where we are in the testing cycle, I won't apply this
> fix to master.
> I'm hoping to cut 4.4 in the next day or two and there's no
> way this will
> get enough testing.
>
>
> OK, here is a total rewrite of the GPS coordinates parsing
> including UTs.
> It is a lot more flexible on the format and supports all the
> formats of the previous parser (AFAIK).
>
> I share your opinion on not including it in 4.4.
>
>
> Do you care to work on the GPS parsing a bit more? We have some
> requests for more lax parsing on our user forum:
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!category-topic/subsurface-divelog/pMPlpNvhmfw
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#%21category-topic/subsurface-divelog/pMPlpNvhmfw>
>
> E.g. 48 51.491n 2 17.677e
No problem. I'll come up with a patch in the next days.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20150222/ed083d65/attachment.html>
More information about the subsurface
mailing list