CMake vs Qmake [was: [PATCH 3/3] Cmake build now contains icons]
Henrik Brautaset Aronsen
subsurface at henrik.synth.no
Tue Feb 24 03:02:08 PST 2015
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Patrick Valsecchi <patrick at thus.ch> wrote:
> On 02/24/2015 09:47 AM, Henrik Brautaset Aronsen wrote:
>
> I just realized that IntelliJ's very promising CLion IDE [1] use CMake
> as its native build system. That should make it quick to get up to speed
> there.
>
> Yes, I'm testing CLion with subsurface. Not 100% satisfied, though.
>
What are you missing? It's still just an EAP, so I guess they'll improve
it some more before the release.
> I use IntelliJ IDEA for other things (mostly Java), and I'm very happy
> with it. I don't see why we can't support both build systems, though, if
> it makes people happy :)
>
> The problem is that one of the two always end up broken.
>
> Do we want to setup Buildbot <http://buildbot.net/> or something like
> that to do some continuous integration? I have some experience with
> buildbot and I can help setup something.
>
I think Dirk has his own little CI setup that he is satisfied with.
Otherwise, there is Travis, but I think it needs the repo to be hosted on
> GitHub.
>
You mean, like https://github.com/torvalds/subsurface ? :)
Henrik
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20150224/b7896e64/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the subsurface
mailing list