[PATCH] small changes to the planner.

[Dirk Hohndel]

On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 05:20:22PM +0200, Joakim Bygdell wrote:
> > Didn't manage to quote the patch for some reason... anyway, any chance we
> > could have the disclaimer message once and use a parameter to insert the
> > algorithm? That way the translators only need to do it once as well.
> > 
> > It's a small nit pick, I know.
> 
> Obviously that is the way to do it.. to much blood in my coffee system I presume.

A serious condition I frequently suffer from as well...

> >> 0002, rearranged the GUI to make it visibly easier to see which settings that belong together.
> >> 0003, disables GF fields when VPM-B is the selected deco model.
> > 
> > Those both seem like great additions. Thank you. What I'm wondering is if
> > you could "indent" the sub items a little - basically add some left margin
> > to them so that it still is obvious that the three modes (recreational,
> > Buhlmann, VPM) are radio buttons and the others are sub options…
> 
> Will do.

Thank you.

> > Silly question, what was the forth patch in the series (since they are
> > numbered x/4)? :-) 
> 
> The fourth was an idea to spell Bühlmann correctly, 

Ha. I got flamed big time when I (as a German) opted for the Americanized
spelling. Back then a could of Google search results showed a lot more for
Buhlmann. Not sure if that's still the case. And since we now use UTF-8
all over the place, maybe it's time to revisit this decision.

But if you do that, please do it everywhere (documentation, etc).

> on the other hand it might be better to use the technical therm ZHL-16B
> as it shows which implementation we use.

ZHL-16B certainly rolls off the tongue, doesn't it? I'm not sure what
people are going to be more familiar with. I would lean towards Bühlmann
and put the exact algorithm in there once (but not as the name of the
radio button that switches algorithms).

Thanks

/D