[PULL REQUEST] GSoC Printing: part 5

[Rick Walsh]

Good morning,

On 29 Jul 2015 6:41 am, "Dirk Hohndel" <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 08:28:00PM +0200, Robert C. Helling wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > > Am 28.07.2015 um 17:41 schrieb Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org>:
> > >
> > > So what someone needs to do is change the profile code to do the right
> > > thing and only show that text if there actually is a ceiling shown.
> >
> > Strictly speaking, the fact that there is no ceiling shown is also
gradient factor dependent so listing them would even make some sense then.
> >
> > Just my two cents.
>
> I realize that you are right, Robert.
> This is simply a reflection on the fact that this looked odd to me. I'll
> figure out a way for this to be more useful. In my infinite spare time
> during which I plan to address all the open issues on my todo list.

My initial reaction was exactly the same as Robert's.  I have many no-deco
dives riding my computer close to the ndl.  Then ended with a nice 5min
safety stop. Setting a lower GF in Subsurface gives them a shallow but
visible ceiling for part of the dive.

Having said that, I don't want seemingly irrelevant numbers printed on my
profile.  I haven't looked at how the ceiling is determined for the
profile, but isn't there a bool variable somewhere indicating whether
there's a ceiling?

>
> /D
> _______________________________________________
> subsurface mailing list
> subsurface at subsurface-divelog.org
> http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20150729/d848833c/attachment.html>