Dive site management on daily build 4.4.2.669

[Benjamin]

Asking might actually be a nice idea. That way people can decide what fudge
factor they want for each set of dives.

On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 20:20 Joakim Bygdell <j.bygdell at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > On 10 Jun 2015, at 17:52, Dirk Hohndel <dirk at hohndel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 03:49:35PM +0000, Benjamin wrote:
> >> Maybe if the dives are withing something smaller than 5 metres then
> merge
> >> them?
> >
> > Yes, even < 10m seems like obviously the same spot.
> > 50m is more questionable in my mind.
> >
> > what do others think?
> >
> > /D
>
> I can see a problem emerging if we are that narrow in the distance
> differential when merging sites.
>
> Wreck diving, depending on wind and surface currents the location of the
> dive boat might easily differ 50m or so even if the target for the dive is
> the same.
> So two divers diving the same wreck on subsequent days will then get
> different locations for the same dive site.
>
> Or should we notify the user that there exists a site within our extended
> (50m radius) distance and ask if it is the same?
>
> /Jocke
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20150610/cbb936a2/attachment.html>