[PATCH 2/2] VPM-B: Adjust Subsurface conservatism
Rick Walsh
rickmwalsh at gmail.com
Sat Oct 3 20:42:54 PDT 2015
Reverting commit 3d8e5b638ad4c1fbb43f6dd5f535bf0b33a51f0b makes the CVA
calculation marginally less conservative, and one of the tests fails as a
result. This tiny adjustment to the conservatism fixes that.
Signed-off-by: Rick Walsh <rickmwalsh at gmail.com>
---
deco.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/deco.c b/deco.c
index f9d6032..86acc03 100644
--- a/deco.c
+++ b/deco.c
@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@
#define cube(x) (x * x * x)
// Subsurface appears to produce marginally less conservative plans than our benchmarks
-// Introduce 1% additional conservatism
-#define subsurface_conservatism_factor 1.01
+// Introduce 1.2% additional conservatism
+#define subsurface_conservatism_factor 1.012
extern bool in_planner();
--
2.4.3
More information about the subsurface
mailing list