[Tomaz Canabrava]

Em 18 de out de 2015 12:02, "Giorgio Marzano" <marzano.giorgio at gmail.com>
escreveu:
>
> Just out of curiosity,
>
> I am not an SQL guy, but it seems to me that subsurface is the typical
application which would benefit greatly using a DBMS to store data and
relations. It would simplify a lot data handling and storage.

It would greatly complexify the data handling and storage - did you took a
look on how the git remote file works, in comparison of how a database
would work?

Also, a database is usually a complex file - it's a binary and very hard
for a human yo read it or modify by hand to test stuff.

A no-no from me.

>
> Is this opportunity ever been take in account?
>
> _______________________________________________
> subsurface mailing list
> subsurface at subsurface-divelog.org
> http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20151018/8f106ee1/attachment-0001.html>