[Giorgio Marzano]

I was not proposing to do so. I guessed that the argument has already been
discussed and I was curious about the issues.

BUT, I don't agree that it would complexify. No more linked lists. Just
queries. It would be (have been) far simpler.

2015-10-18 16:58 GMT+02:00 Tomaz Canabrava <tcanabrava at kde.org>:

>
> Em 18 de out de 2015 12:02, "Giorgio Marzano" <marzano.giorgio at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
> >
> > Just out of curiosity,
> >
> > I am not an SQL guy, but it seems to me that subsurface is the typical
> application which would benefit greatly using a DBMS to store data and
> relations. It would simplify a lot data handling and storage.
>
> It would greatly complexify the data handling and storage - did you took a
> look on how the git remote file works, in comparison of how a database
> would work?
>
> Also, a database is usually a complex file - it's a binary and very hard
> for a human yo read it or modify by hand to test stuff.
>
> A no-no from me.
>
> >
> > Is this opportunity ever been take in account?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > subsurface mailing list
> > subsurface at subsurface-divelog.org
> > http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/pipermail/subsurface/attachments/20151018/8cb7311e/attachment.html>